Page 1 of 2
Road Trip: Rental or no?
Posted: Mon Jan 19, 2009 9:14
by RedRoadster
I've got a trip to Cali coming up (The one that will prevent me from making the 2/1 run) and I had a question.
For a strictly business road trip of 2,000 miles, would you put the miles on your own car, or get a rental?
Rental:
Pros: potential for better mileage
Not putting miles on the 3 (not taking the Miata this time)
cons: rental cost.
Posted: Mon Jan 19, 2009 9:14
by MazdaTom
If it's a business trip, who is paying for the rental? If you take your own car, will you get paid mileage? When I travel on business, I get to claim the mileage to and from the airport. If I were to drive to the destination, they wouldn't pay me mileage but would settle on a flat rate (since all the travel destinations are pretty far away).
Posted: Mon Jan 19, 2009 9:14
by tsx_guy
I agree with Tom. With previous business trips my company covered the plane ticket, hotel and car rental if needed. I would suspect they should cover your travel costs as well. If driving is the only option I would get a rental and let the company cover the cost.
Posted: Mon Jan 19, 2009 9:14
by RedRoadster
Perhaps 'business' was the wrong word.
It's personal travel, but it's not a pleasure trip.
Posted: Mon Jan 19, 2009 9:14
by MazdaTom
Tough call.
How bad is the mileage on the 3 to not consider taking it? You might save a little in gas money by getting a rental, but probably not enough to justify the cost of the rental.
I'd probably stick to taking the 3 on strictly economic reasons. The 3 is just an economy car. It's not going to go up in value by keeping the miles off.
Posted: Tue Jan 20, 2009 9:14
by tsx_guy
i think the 3 would be a fun car to take to cali....whipping through the mountains and all. Consider it a "break in" trip.

Posted: Tue Jan 20, 2009 9:14
by GTConversion
What good is your car if not to put miles on it? The first thing I did with my RX8 was put 1200 miles on it driving from CA to CO.
Posted: Tue Jan 20, 2009 9:14
by Colombia28
I'm driving out to Cali in March. No rental for me, just me and the speed. I get surprisingly good mileage on the highway with the speed. I would bet you would get awesome mileage with the 3. Not sure what rental would beat the 3.
Posted: Tue Jan 20, 2009 9:14
by RedRoadster
I'm beginning to see the light here.
I think i was clouded by a recent trip from Cleveland to NY in the rental 6s. The thing that stuck in my mind was the range of the thing.. I think I got 400+ miles out of a single tank...
Posted: Tue Jan 20, 2009 9:14
by Colombia28
Red95FMII wrote:I'm beginning to see the light here.
I think i was clouded by a recent trip from Cleveland to NY in the rental 6s. The thing that stuck in my mind was the range of the thing.. I think I got 400+ miles out of a single tank...
The 6i i have as a rental right now gets near 500 miles to a tank. I cant remember what the size of the tank on the 3 is, but if its about the same you would probably get pretty close to that.
Posted: Wed Jan 21, 2009 9:14
by ZoomPrincess
I could be wrong here, but if I remember correctly I think the 3 has a 12 gallon tank, and the 6 has a 18 gallon tank.
Posted: Wed Jan 21, 2009 9:14
by Colombia28
ZoomPrincess wrote:I could be wrong here, but if I remember correctly I think the 3 has a 12 gallon tank, and the 6 has a 18 gallon tank.
That sounds right to me. The first time i filled up the 6i and it went past 12 gallons i was surprised.
Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2009 9:14
by turbo99jetta
14.5 gallons on the 3.... 18 gallons on the 6
Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2009 9:14
by Colombia28
turbo99jetta wrote:14.5 gallons on the 3.... 18 gallons on the 6
Sweet. Thanks Josh!
Either way i think the 3 would be perfectly fine for a drive to CA.
Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2009 9:14
by Rich
I'd take the 3. Rental can be a pain, as you don't know the reliability of the vehicle you get.